Tuesday, February 20, 2018
WJLA7, Sinclair-owned station in Washington DC, is warning parents that students who repost threats to schools they receive to others could face criminal charges or at least expulsion from school. Reposting of such messages could be treated very much like reposting child pornography (for which there was a scare a week ago).
Some attention to this possibility comes from a story about a Spapchat at a different Florida school, reported here. This is even more ironic because Snapchat posts are supposed to disappear.
Sunday, February 18, 2018
Matthew La Plante has a story in the Sunday Washington Post, by Matthew La Plante, p. A11, maintaining that politicians in Utah and several other states want to frame porn addiction as a public health crisis. Utah, in particular, considers a law allowing “victims” to sue publishers for adult content viewed accidentally by children.
Is this COPA all over again? Remember the COPA trial a decade ago, and the debate on filters and adult-id?
Tuesday, February 13, 2018
Hosting providers use security companies to scan for illegal content which could be placed by foreign hackers
In conjunction with a recent Cato Institute briefing on the unintended overreach of some state sex offender registry laws, it’s worth noting that hosting providers are now using software to scan customer sites for malware and this could include illegal content like child pornography (identifiable with digital watermarks) which could be placed particularly by foreign enemies as a kind of subtle terrorism or attack on American legal and democratic values. Site Lock is one of the companies used to scan sites. Older sites, those not updated or accessed as often, or with unused unneeded capacity (email accounts, for example) could start to develop a risk.
The topic came up at the end of the session in an audience question. There was a comment from the panel that “mens rea” is more likely to be useful in defense today when a person’s property is hacked (by an enemy) than it would have been fifteen years ago, when law enforcement and the court systems did not understand the Internet as well.
This problem could be related to issues reported before, when computers are infected with illegal content discovered by repair technicians.
Saturday, February 03, 2018
Arrest of a substitute teacher in Maryland shows the practical risks of Internet abuse; sudden warning about a Facebook video
A substitute teacher in Charles County, Maryland, about 30 miles SE of Washington DC, was child with showing sexually explicit materials to a minor and child pornography possession, with state charges, after having worked only 34 days. A student reported his texting of another student, WTOP story here.
But the incident shows that, despite fingerprint background checks, it is very difficult for school systems to vet substitute teachers well before hire. They can look at social media, but this may run into First Amendment concerns with public employees. But with substitute teachers principals at individual schools can ban substitutes under any suspicion whatsoever, and most school systems have “three strike” rules.
Just as I was typing this story, I learned of a c.p. video circulating on Facebook from station WJLA7 in Washington, link. It may have originated in Alabama, but was reported to Sinclair news in Cincinnati first. Resharing it is illegal and could lead to prosecution by federal law. But Facebook is likely to have removed the video before it gets very far. The WJLA story notes that resending such a video for "journalistic" purposes would not prevent criminal prosecution. But that statement could, by analogy, raise serious questions about citizen journalism in other areas, like terrorism. But possession of a c.p. image is itself a crime; possession of bomb-making instructions is not, although possession of the actual materials might be.